January 1, 2011 in the laboratory of conceptual art called Las Palmas Gran Canaria. Dog meat
In the work of Guillermo Vargas Habacuc, discussed "The Nativity dog's death" in the eyes of the art world.
is the proof that in art, being a very complex piece of information (speaking of sensations and feelings without words with the obligation to come up with intensity), the receiver is providing the message ends.
- Habakkuk wants to see the attitude of the observers of his work at the Biennale in Costa Rica. Gets a moral distance response, and response away from the work itself.
- Internet appears a reaction of moral militancy of the middle class economic North. Wants to ban the book of Habakkuk.
- MUTATUM want to do a piece of work, represent the moral and alienation of that middle class.
MUTATUM-receptor want to file online (Another way of spreading the parallel world of art), a work that wants to take the simplistic interpretation of art, the middle class of northern economic in the process of disappearing, with one-way training and alienated.
The dog called Natividad Natividad like the tramp, a man in Nicaragua who dies in Costa Rica, under conditions very similar to those that killed the dog Natividad. How should we interpret the stance of the middle class first world?, Grief over the death of Natividad dog and indifference to the dying of the Nativity. Why
Habakkuk's work is so neutral?, So little socially committed, "estándolo." Why transcends just one aspect of the work and the social background is hidden? Why
"pants Marx" and "the obituary of capitalism" of PSJM are neutralized by the system?, despite his "liberals", quasi-revolutionary, as their aggressiveness, even tickles the system as if they were immunized against criticism and reason.
The alleged ability of the system to gobble up ideas that may do damage, we could summarize the following points:
- Neutralization of ideas after the alienation caused by the media and propaganda devised by the think tanks of the system.
- Art "progressive" measured and controlled by the institutionalized power in official art world. Controlled by the power centers of the system, "pre-critical" of the curators, curators political capitalism.
- The art world is isolated from the town, comes to a small elite in the process of disappearing, which spends too much money for an impoverished setting, postmodern and unimaginative.
- The artist is involved, see the fact from the outside.
PD 1 - All, I repeat, all that is said or implied in the presentation of the work is real.
PD 2 - The sensitivities are different in London and San José (Costa Rica), social and love for animals.
PD 3 - The culture of a people is the culture of the ruling class. The thought also if they are ignored.
Concept Art - Dog meat - 1 of 2 (659.3M)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9NzEjsZcOI
In the work of Guillermo Vargas Habacuc, discussed "The Nativity dog's death" in the eyes of the art world.
is the proof that in art, being a very complex piece of information (speaking of sensations and feelings without words with the obligation to come up with intensity), the receiver is providing the message ends.
- Habakkuk wants to see the attitude of the observers of his work at the Biennale in Costa Rica. Gets a moral distance response, and response away from the work itself.
- Internet appears a reaction of moral militancy of the middle class economic North. Wants to ban the book of Habakkuk.
- MUTATUM want to do a piece of work, represent the moral and alienation of that middle class.
MUTATUM-receptor want to file online (Another way of spreading the parallel world of art), a work that wants to take the simplistic interpretation of art, the middle class of northern economic in the process of disappearing, with one-way training and alienated.
The dog called Natividad Natividad like the tramp, a man in Nicaragua who dies in Costa Rica, under conditions very similar to those that killed the dog Natividad. How should we interpret the stance of the middle class first world?, Grief over the death of Natividad dog and indifference to the dying of the Nativity. Why
Habakkuk's work is so neutral?, So little socially committed, "estándolo." Why transcends just one aspect of the work and the social background is hidden? Why
"pants Marx" and "the obituary of capitalism" of PSJM are neutralized by the system?, despite his "liberals", quasi-revolutionary, as their aggressiveness, even tickles the system as if they were immunized against criticism and reason.
The alleged ability of the system to gobble up ideas that may do damage, we could summarize the following points:
- Neutralization of ideas after the alienation caused by the media and propaganda devised by the think tanks of the system.
- Art "progressive" measured and controlled by the institutionalized power in official art world. Controlled by the power centers of the system, "pre-critical" of the curators, curators political capitalism.
- The art world is isolated from the town, comes to a small elite in the process of disappearing, which spends too much money for an impoverished setting, postmodern and unimaginative.
- The artist is involved, see the fact from the outside.
PD 1 - All, I repeat, all that is said or implied in the presentation of the work is real.
PD 2 - The sensitivities are different in London and San José (Costa Rica), social and love for animals.
PD 3 - The culture of a people is the culture of the ruling class. The thought also if they are ignored.
Concept Art - Dog meat - 1 of 2 (659.3M)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9NzEjsZcOI
0 comments:
Post a Comment